Tell me more ×
Libraries & Information Science Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for librarians and library professionals. It's 100% free, no registration required.

If a library is looking into forming a digitization team dedicated to digitizing your rare & special collections:

  1. How should what gets digitized be determined? Should this be focused more on monographs, or should items like maps/ephemera be considered) If the librarian cannot or will not determine these decisions, who should?
  2. Is there a standard that should be followed for digitization?
  3. Is there a standard that should be followed for preservation?
  4. Where should this unit live within the library organization - as part of rare books? part of tech services? another unit?
share|improve this question
2  
This are relevant topics but it's a bunch of questions instand of one. There will unlikely be one answer. You may better asks for existing surveys andy particular aspects to get a general picture of digitization in libraries. – Jakob Aug 19 '12 at 6:49
1  
How about if you ask multiple questions instead and ask for general practice instead of anecdotal reports (avoid the work 'you')? Thanks! – Jakob Aug 19 '12 at 7:04
1  
+1 I think any library that is digitizing special collections will have considered all of these questions, and while technically anecdotal, the information would be useful to another library considering digitization. The sub-questions allow for easy organization of answers for comparison. – Mary Jo Finch Aug 19 '12 at 15:27
@MaryJoFinch (and @jambina) While I respect your opinion, in keeping with a tradition of creating a repository of material in an SE Q+A, rather than a collection of anecdotes, I have made the question more general – jonsca Aug 19 '12 at 22:41
1  
Jambina, there are a lot of questions here. You might want to consider breaking up the ones that are not as closely related (like where a Digitization department should live within the library). – jonsca Aug 19 '12 at 22:42

6 Answers

Guidelines on digitization for various materials (still images, moving images, audio...) can be found at the Federal Agencies Digitization Guidelines site: http://www.digitizationguidelines.gov/. Their project planning materials http://www.digitizationguidelines.gov/guidelines/digitize-planning.html may be of some use in exploring how to tackle digitization efforts. While your organization may make some different choices, these guidelines should be a useful starting point for your organizational discussion.

share|improve this answer

I'd like to add some small advice on Paul Wheatley's answer regarding file formats. Archival master images should always be saved as uncompressed files, as compression comes with some problems. If i. e. just one bit in the compressed image flips, the rest of your master (behind that bit in the bitstream) is useless and lost. Also, compression uses up cycles on your archival servers that will be better used doing other things like creating downscaled copies of your master images for presentation.

share|improve this answer

I came across an interesting set of resources for digitization today. It's called Digital Preservation in a Box, created by the Library of Congress's National Digital Stewardship Alliance (NDSA). Resources include tools and discussions of format and risk issues. It's too much to really encapsulate here, but it does address some of your questions. The Library of Congress Standards are on their website, but may be more technical than what you are looking for.

An additional, exhaustive set of online resources can be found on the Digital Curation Resource Guide. The list includes links to discussion groups, file formats and guidelines, sample library policies, standards, software and tools, and blogs. The list was compiled by Charles W. Bailey, Jr., formerly Assistant Dean for Digital Library Planning and Development at the University of Houston Libraries.

share|improve this answer
The Digital Preservation in a Box materials are relevant to digitized holdings, but they are really useful for any digital collections -- including born digital materials. They really are a good resource. – MGallinger Aug 29 '12 at 12:04

The LIFE-SHARE Project produced a useful set of resources that help to take the reader through the process of establishing and implementing a digitisation activity, as well as guiding dissemination and preservation (See the Digitisation Toolkit). There is also an end to end case study on digitising Special Collections which made these recommendations (summarised to keep this response concise):

  • Consider implementing an online form for receiving digitisation requests
  • Scan all images which are to form archival master images in a repository in uncompressed or lossless compression formats
  • Create technical standards for all images created and check that equipment used is fit for purpose
  • If storing images digitised as part of an on-demand service in a repository, it is important to identify images for storage at the point of capture so that they can be digitised to the appropriate standards
  • Try to use existing infrastructure if it can be adapted to your purpose

The project also explored consortial models, how they might be applied in order to create shared digitisation services, and what aspects of interaction were important in order to create effective partnerships (trust, communication, coordination, etc).

share|improve this answer

Unpacking the first part of the first question....

How should what gets digitized be determined?

Creating a policy to prioritize or queue items for digitization is nearly impossible to perfect. That's an anecdotal observation from working on digitizing special collections projects for two years as an academic librarian at 75% time with digital curation and 25% time with special collections. The primary reason is priorities will change on a near daily basis.

Factors influencing (remixed from NEDCC, JISC, NDSA, LOC, & RBMS among others) the development of a prioritization policy could include (I won't say they are ordered, as that would put into question the veracity of my already anecdotal answer):

  • institutional/university policy
  • organizational/departmental mission statement
  • collection development policies
  • collection management policies
  • national laws and regulations
  • user needs
  • funds
  • digitization equipment
  • evaluation of subject experts
  • condition & stability
  • market trend
  • value/risk
share|improve this answer

3.Is there a standard that should be followed for preservation?

An ALA task force is documenting the minimum recommended tech specs for digitization. It's only in draft now, but it's well-cited and concise. http://connect.ala.org/node/185648

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.